| |
| | ||||||
Polar Bear Gets ‘Endangered’ ListingThis is a discussion on Polar Bear Gets ‘Endangered’ Listing within the In The News forums, part of the Community category; Polar Bear Gets ‘Endangered’ Listing, But Win Limited for Green Groups Ashby Jones (The Wall Street Journal) It’s not exactly ... |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,629
Thanks: 898
Thanked 721 Times in 402 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Polar Bear Gets ‘Endangered’ Listing Polar Bear Gets ‘Endangered’ Listing, But Win Limited for Green Groups Ashby Jones (The Wall Street Journal) It’s not exactly in our jurisdiction, but we did blog last week on a federal-court ruling that allowed the Interior Department some extra time to decide whether the polar bear should be placed on the endangered species list, so we feel duty-bound to come back with the news of the department’s decision. The news: the polar bear will be placed under the protection of the Endangered Species Act, a decision announced yesterday by Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne. Environmental groups had hoped to use the listing as a tool to make further greenhouse-gas reducing changes. But Kempthorne ruled that out yesterday, ensuring only a partial win for organizations like Greenpeace and the National Resources Defense Council. Explains the NYT: the Bush administration had long argued that a listing wouldn’t require it to “mitigate the cause of the species’ decline.” Kempthorne agreed with this position, stating yesterday, according to the Times, that “when the Endangered Species Act was adopted in 1973, I don’t think terms like ‘climate change’ were part of our vernacular.” The editorial board at the Journal applauded Kempthorne’s restraint. “Mr. Kempthorne was careful to sever the environmentalists’ preposterous chain of assumptions: That ice is melting is not proof that global warming is to blame,” it wrote. “If Congress wants to enact global-warming legislation, then so be it – but the costs and benefits should be argued in the open. This fly-by-night policy making is not only unscientific. It’s undemocratic.” The Wall Street Journal
__________________ . |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,629
Thanks: 898
Thanked 721 Times in 402 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Polar Bear Gets ‘Endangered’ Listing The irony is the Polar Bear population has actually dramatically increased over the past decade.
__________________ . |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Master Shopper ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 927
Thanks: 974
Thanked 860 Times in 424 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Polar Bear Gets ‘Endangered’ Listing I know! The case is that their environment is endangered so to speak, getting warmer and melting. Their food supply is also diminishing and as a consequence , their population will suffer. To add more trouble to the equation, the polars are going out of their normal habitat and clash with the encroaching humans. They are wonderful and powerful animals, it would be a pity if the become extinct.
__________________ Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass; it's about learning to dance in the rain. The Diva |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| bear, listing, polar, ‘endangered’ |
| Search Cloud |
| |
| Thread Tools | |
| |